![]() ![]() Microsoft first introduced it in 1996, but they based the tool on a lot of existing concepts of automatic code completion and syntax checking. Visual Studio IntelliSense is an instance of automatic code completion. Visual Studio IntelliSense Stopped Working. We’ll then close the post with quick advice on how to get IntelliSense to work for your own classes and types. Then we’ll proceed to cover the different solutions you can try to get you out of this nightmarish scenario. We’ll cover a little bit of history, plus a few definitions, so you can grasp why this tool is more than a simple autocomplete. We’ll start out by doing a quick overview of Visual Studio IntelliSense. So, what to do when you need Visual Studio IntelliSense but, for whatever reason, it’s not working? That’s what this post is about. Being able to put a period after some variable and get a nice list of all the possible members you can call isn’t only a nicety: it’s a survival need. There’s no way you could remember all those classes, interfaces, and methods. NET Framework BCL (Base Class Library) is just too large for a human?brain to grasp. This intelligent code completion tool present in Visual Studio is definitely a must-have for a. And there’s a very specific tool in that category I want to talk about today. Once you get used to relying?on them, it’s terribly frustrating when you’re prevented from using them for some reason. These tools often start as “nice-to-haves” but quickly graduate to “must-haves” due to the benefits they provide. Which makes me more curious about the comment asking if anyone uses the tools researchers are working on for visualizing a project.There are certain tools that have become indispensable for developers in this day and age. So we need something that covers concerns orthogonal to what already exists. None of them say what the code *does* or how it does it. However those things are useful to me only: if you know nothing about code, have any resources to plug testing holes, or are actively managing a codebase, respectively. Current tools give you unuseful amounts like cyclomatic complexity, or other ratings like test coverage or Fowler's class interdepence/brittleness/(whatever) measure. ![]() ![]() To understand a new set of code or codebase, I need something that analyzes the code and reports back to me on its tactics and strategies - what patterns are used, what weaknesses are in the code. These static diagrams represent only the level of the code instead of being an interactive object with drill-downs or abstract-up commands! The UML usually generates accurate structures for classes, but doesn't or cannot generate execution diagrams (what, 4 types in UML?) or state diagrams.Ģ. Yet there are still a couple problems with that:ġ. The most prominent other tool for project conceptualization is UML which has been gaining IDE integration. Unfortunately most if not all IDEs are still code-file based. There have been many links posted which I'm going to have to explore - not the editor links (jEdit and Emacs rulz!) but the conceptualization links. ![]() There are many times when you don't want to or cannot run/debug a program to analyze it. They could mean that they or the person assigned don't read code, yet they need to know how a program works, or what it does. Unfortunately the story poster was a bit vague. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |